evaluation criteria

description

marks

1. visual design

overall look of the project should be aesthetically pleasing to the eye, featuring a clear colour scheme, appropriate typography and a well structured layout.

5

1. user experience

evaluates how user-friendly the design is, considering accessibility and ease of navigation. the design should be intuitive and straightforward for users.

5

1. creativity

measures the innovation and originality of the design. the solution should be imaginative yet realistic so that it can be achievable with the necessary resources.

5

1. uniqueness

the project should present a unique approach to addressing the identified problem, highlighting how it stands out.

5

1. relevance

determines how well the design aligns with the given theme, demonstrating clear and explicit connections between the design elements and the theme.

5

evaluation criteria

description

marks

1. uniqueness

the project should present a unique approach to addressing the identified problem, highlighting how it stands out.

5

1. creativity

measures the innovation and originality of the code. the solution should be imaginative yet realistic so that it can be achievable with the necessary resources.

5

1. user experience

evaluates how user-friendly the design is, considering accessibility and ease of navigation. the design should be intuitive and straightforward for users.

5

1. practicality

considers how effectively the code can be applied in real-world scenarios. it should fulfill its intended purpose, displaying a high level of functionality, completeness and potential for future enhancements.

5

1. technical

assesses the quality, complexity and sophistication of the code used, including use of well-structured code, efficient coding practices that reflect the developer’s knowledge.

5

1. relevance

determines how well the design aligns with the given theme, demonstrating clear and explicit connections between the code elements and the theme.

5